Mullvad VPN vs IVPN
Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.
| Mullvad VPN | IVPN | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| KYC level | L1Anonymous | L1Anonymous |
| Tagline | Account-number-only VPN, accepts cash and Monero | No-logs VPN, cash and crypto accepted |
| Jurisdiction | Sweden | Gibraltar |
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Tor / .onion | No | No |
| Accepts Monero (XMR) | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No signup required | Yes | Yes |
| Accepts fiat | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Web app | Yes | Yes |
| Available worldwide | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
Based on our trust scoring, **Mullvad VPN** comes out ahead of **IVPN** (9.6 vs 9.0). The gap reflects differences in KYC stance, custody model and operational track record.
Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.