Bisq vs RoboSats
Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.
| Bisq | RoboSats | |
|---|---|---|
| Trust score | 9.5 | 9.4 |
| KYC level | L0Trustless | L0Trustless |
| Tagline | Decentralised P2P Bitcoin exchange | P2P Bitcoin trading over Tor with Lightning |
| Jurisdiction | Decentralised | Decentralised |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Tor / .onion | No | Yes |
| Non-custodial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| No signup required | Yes | Yes |
| Tor (.onion) available | Yes | Yes |
| Lightning Network | — | Yes |
| Peer-to-peer | Yes | Yes |
| Accepts fiat | Yes | Yes |
| Available worldwide | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
Both services score within a hair of each other (9.5 vs 9.4). Pick based on the specific feature you need — see the row-by-row breakdown above.
Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.